RE: thanks, god.
April 9, 2009 at 7:20 pm
(This post was last modified: April 9, 2009 at 7:22 pm by LukeMC.)
(April 9, 2009 at 7:03 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Like I said, morals don't apply to God. Our own interests are insignificant. Our labels are insufficient. It's egotistical to presume they are. That would be to limit God, which is illogical.
Yet you claim you can label God as being "all good"?? This seems so contradictory to me.
Morals don't apply to God- yet God is all good
Our own interests are insignificant- yet your claim that God is all good stands true
Our labels are insufficient- yet calling him all good is a fitting label
It's egotistical to presume they are- yet assuming God is all good is fine
That would be to limit God- yet limiting him to fit under one moral catergory is fine?
It seems your entire paragraph there is in stark contradiction to your main premise.