RE: thanks, god.
April 10, 2009 at 7:25 am
(This post was last modified: April 10, 2009 at 7:25 am by LukeMC.)
(April 10, 2009 at 3:51 am)fr0d0 Wrote:(April 9, 2009 at 7:20 pm)LukeMC Wrote: It seems your entire paragraph there is in stark contradiction to your main premise.
How so?
Oh dear.
I really shouldn't go over this again but if you're going to be like that...
Morals don't apply to God
Yet you stated that God is all good, therefore applying morals to God. <<<THIS part is a contradiction.
Our own interests are insignificant
Yet you stated that God is all good, which is a complete waste of time as your interpretations of God's nature and actions mean nothing. What you choose to believe is insignificant and we needn't consider it to be any more true than any other claim.
Our labels are insufficient
Yet you label God as good and claim this suffices as an accurate claim. <contradiction
It is egotistical to presume they are
Yet you still do it. <contradiction
That would be to limit God
Yet you blatently limit God to being only good, labelling him so and presuming his nature. <contradiction
If you can't see the contradictions there you must be performing some sort of parody. Nobody can be that oblivious.
