RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics)
August 21, 2016 at 9:22 am
(This post was last modified: August 21, 2016 at 9:27 am by theBorg.)
(August 21, 2016 at 8:01 am)robvalue Wrote: It may not even be a meaningful definition, because it assumes there actually was a first life form. This assumes either a finite past
Quote: "for a physicist infinity is monstrosity! In real world, there is no such thing as infinity." (the famous Dr. Michio Kaku, the Japanese American theoretical physicist, futurist, and popularizer of science. Kaku is a professor of theoretical physics at the City College...). Shall I give you my short (unpublished in the PRE) disproof of the infinite past?
