(August 29, 2016 at 2:49 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Well, electromagnetism itself doesn't seem to express emotion...so I'm not sure why you'd consider it to be inherent -to it-..particularly in that you then refer to our "circuitry" as the explanation for emotion..or rather our expression of behaviors which we call emotion in human beings relative to plant behavior. If I wanted to explain human emotion..I'd look to the circuitry involved..rather than electromagnetism.
That we share or possess similar functions or abilties, itself..ought not to surprise anyone, nor does it beg for a drawing down to fundamental forces as an explanation. We are related to cauliflower after all. We went with locomotion while they mastered organic chemistry.
No but the EM field of the heart is many thousands of times stronger than the brain and is the first receiver of external information.
It only takes a few key thoughts (electric) or sights, to trigger a charge state change that is felt over the entire body at once (magnetic reaction). These charge states also have their own inertia and one way bias as I'm sure you are familiar. It's much easier to go from happy to pissed, than from pissed to happy.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
