Your trepidation is understandable, but rest assured I have no intent other than a positive and fruitful conversation. I enjoy seeing others viewpoints and sharing my own, usually the former.
I understand your definitions and you are contending that due to one's religious thinging logic and evidence are impossibilities?
Assuming you are I'd like if you looked at your definition of evidence. As your definition stands I'd agree that religious thinking has no direct correlation to evidence to the point of it being majorly devoid of it. I don't think you can say the same thing about logic. Perhaps if you said Religious thinking is illusory due to lack of evidence I would agree with our statement using your definiitions. I however consider faith something completely different.
I understand your definitions and you are contending that due to one's religious thinging logic and evidence are impossibilities?
Assuming you are I'd like if you looked at your definition of evidence. As your definition stands I'd agree that religious thinking has no direct correlation to evidence to the point of it being majorly devoid of it. I don't think you can say the same thing about logic. Perhaps if you said Religious thinking is illusory due to lack of evidence I would agree with our statement using your definiitions. I however consider faith something completely different.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
