RE: How do we grow?
May 21, 2011 at 11:02 pm
(This post was last modified: May 21, 2011 at 11:03 pm by Eudaimonia.)
(May 21, 2011 at 3:35 pm)tackattack Wrote: So then how do you support your claim that faith is without logic? I also feel it's a little more than ridiculous to look for objective materialistic quantifiable evidence as proof of God. That evidence type should match the proof. Mathematical justification for mathematical truth, scientific evidence for scientific proof, etc. As far as my definition of Faith, I agree completely with Ryft's definition here which basically summarized, as it applied to Christians, is the sum of having reliable information, being persuaded of it's truthfulness and trusting in it.
Faith without logic = The premise that God exists is false..
I'm not sure what to say.. It seems that you think having no evidence of God means having faith.. I too see having no evidence of God means having faith.. So we agree.. right?
