Why materialists are predominantly materialists

[Angrboda]

You're full of shit.  Consciousness, isn't.   You claim that consciousness is.  That's a claim that requires more support than a stupid semantic argument or saying that it's self-evident.  You've never been shy that you believe in Idealism.  What is that Idealism world composed of if consciousness isn't a real thing?  And here you are trying to deny the ontology your well-known Idealism requires.  If consciousness isn't what it appears to be, then your "world of ideas" is an empty non-space.  You're simply being dishonest in pretending agnosticism here.

First of all, I don't "believe in" idealism.  I'm agnostic about the nature of reality, but I consider a kind of experiential idealism a better default position than a material monism.  This is because there's a 100% chance that all knowledge is known only by a subjective agent, and an unknown chance that all subjective agency is dependent on a material substrate.  100% > not sure, any day of the week.

More word games. Your odds don't make any sense. Both "all knowledge is known only by a subjective agent" and "subjective agency is dependent on a material substrate" may both be true at the same time. And "all knowledge is known only by a subjective agent" doesn't lead to Idealism. You're just spinning BS to CYA. The chance that "all knowledge is known only by a subjective agent" implies an Idealism is also unknown.