Whether you believe in God or not - anyone is welcome to discuss it...
And how can you say fr0d0 as you did above "f you follow my reasoning tho' bozo, you see that what you're defining as God isn't accurate. You seem to want a scape goat, not reason."
You have no evidence of God and can have no better definiton than anyone else.
I use the definition of a supernatural creator basically - anything else is optional.
You don't know God's mind, you can't - you don't remotely know it. So isn't it a little bit arrogant of you to say bozo is using a scapegoat and is using the wrong defintion when who says that YOUR definition is right anyway?
There is no evidnece of God - who says that God wants this or that. Who's to say they've got the right definition.
If there's no evidence he exists who's to say he's good rather than neutral or evil for example? You don't know God - you can't know it's a scapegoat - you can't know 'the correct God definition' and you most certainly can't know God's mind.
EvF
And how can you say fr0d0 as you did above "f you follow my reasoning tho' bozo, you see that what you're defining as God isn't accurate. You seem to want a scape goat, not reason."
You have no evidence of God and can have no better definiton than anyone else.
I use the definition of a supernatural creator basically - anything else is optional.
You don't know God's mind, you can't - you don't remotely know it. So isn't it a little bit arrogant of you to say bozo is using a scapegoat and is using the wrong defintion when who says that YOUR definition is right anyway?
There is no evidnece of God - who says that God wants this or that. Who's to say they've got the right definition.
If there's no evidence he exists who's to say he's good rather than neutral or evil for example? You don't know God - you can't know it's a scapegoat - you can't know 'the correct God definition' and you most certainly can't know God's mind.
EvF
