No actually we are not clear. Ignorance of what?
Actually you are the one who claims someone has directly measured the one way speed of light. So please provide your proof of this. Remember they can’t use the Einstein Synchrony Convention to synchronize their clocks because they would be assuming the proof (I know you cannot provide any examples of this because Einstein himself said it is impossible).
Nowhere on earth can we find the precise temperature conditions used in the experiment. It used very calculated temperatures and heat application and removal. You are the one suggesting this can happen naturally, so I would argue you have the burden of proof here. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
It’s obvious you don’t even read my posts. Where did I say life doesn’t live in superheated conditions? I said the temperature conditions used in the experiment are not found anywhere on earth.
You mixed up your responses (again). The branching is due to the use of tri-functional amino acids, not 50:50 chiral amino acids.
The polymers produced in the experiment were not the polymers required to form life.
He didn’t use water to cool the experiment; water breaks down amino acids, hence the need for the extreme heat (to remove the presence of water). So look elsewhere on earth I guess…keep looking.
Give me a break. You are talking about justified interference; I am talking about unjustified interference. Setting up the experiment is one thing, but if your hypothesis is that these things can occur naturally you do not set up your experiment using conditions that are un-natural and guided by intelligence. If he wanted to test his hypothesis he would have used natural temperature conditions, an accurate amount of tri-functional amino acids, and impure amino acids because this is what we find in nature. However he did none of this, probably because he knew he would not have observed any peptides forming under those conditions. He stacked the deck and by doing so proved nothing.
No ‘origins of life’ experiment has ever produced only mono-chiral amino acids, they all fail.
Except for the tiny fact that deep sea vents are found in the ocean which contains water right? Fox removed all water from his experiment.
Never said the amino acids were not found in nature, I said their pure forms were not, the impure forms would not form peptides. So my argument still stands. Yes, I have done laboratory work before.
I didn’t see your historical source saying servants in Bible times were treated the same as American slaves.
Secondly, Jesus said that quote? I thought it was the apostle Paul.
Thirdly, the entire book of Exodus is about the freeing of slaves, so your point really is silly.
Were American slaves released after 6 years?
“2 “If you buy aa Hebrew slave, he shall serve for six years; but on the seventh he shall go out as a free man without payment.” Exodus 21
12 “aIf your 1kinsman, a Hebrew man or woman, is sold to you, then he shall serve you six years, but in the seventh year you shall set him 2free. Deut 15
If an American slave was freed was he given gifts by his master so he could survive on his own?
14 “You shall furnish him liberally from your flock and from your threshing floor and from your wine vat; you shall give to him as the LORD your God has blessed you. Deut 15
"Slave labor played a minor economic role in the ancient Near East, for privately-owned slaves functioned more as domestic servants than as an agricultural or industrial labor force." – Harper’s Bible Dictionary
So maybe it is you who is revising history.
Oh I so called this one!! I told a few of my friends I had asked this question and we all agreed you would dodge it because atheists have no logical basis for saying slavery is wrong. So how can you bash the Bible for supposedly not condemning something you seem to have no basis to condemn either? So typical.
