You keep playing three card Monty with the burden of proof here. We know that mono-chirality is necessary for life. You are asserting that not only can life spontaneously generate on earth, but it did. So the burden of proof is actually on you to demonstrate this. This will be a tough task considering no lab experiment has ever resulted in mono-chiral amino acids and we have never observed them to appear in nature outside the cell. Best of luck.
What? Again, if this life is using amino acids to form anything it is using DNA to do so.
I don’t really have to support it because the burden of proof is on you (you are the one asserting it did happen). We have never observed it to happen, so to say it happened is just a matter of faith. This is all fine and dandy, but I already have my own faith.
Ok, well then where are these documents proving it was much worse than American Slavery? You have still produced nothing.
Exodus records the fact that slavery happened in those days. Sure Abraham had servants, where in scripture does it say Abraham was perfect and sinless?
I already gave you plenty of evidence, including the Rohl findings; however I believe the show I was watching was called “the Naked Archeologist”.
Well many archeologists such as Rohl are finding that the Egyptian Chronology was misinterpreted because several of the dynasties that were thought to be successive were actually parallel. So there were people working in labor camps (slaves) who were from Israel? Exodus doesn’t say this?
I thought it made it pretty clear that their native names were listed along with their Egyptian names (something Exodus mentions) and these native names were Hebrew which means they were Israelites.
It is true. So we have an Egyptian describing the very events which are also described in Exodus and you say there is no evidence to support the accounts in Exodus? This is eyewitness corroboration, which is a very solid form of evidence.
Slavery violates human rights that all people possess and have always possessed? Where did these rights come from then?
I am not arguing that it is not wrong; I have a completely logical reason for believing why it is wrong. Just because Abraham did it does not mean it was condoned in the Bible. David had someone killed, and that does not mean the Bible condoned that action. These were not perfect men, which I think attests to the validity of these stories. Now if you can find where Jesus, who was perfect, owned slaves then maybe I would see your point.
I find It very interesting you used a form of the word “proof” here. How can you prove something happened 3.5 billion years ago?