Breaking down the "God sees argument"

[ApeNotKillApe]

It's simple premise.

Either A or notA.

Says who?

If A is true, then not A is false. if NotA is true, then A is false.

Or they're simultaneously true and false but only a little bit..

I think I have to break it down this way, because, people often like muddying the issue, instead of dealing with the argument.

Damn them and their perfectly logical questions.

There is an objectively measured you.  For example, a moon you may have no idea what size it is, but it's size exists objectively regardless. You too exist regardless.

Regardless of what, whether or not a moon knows my size?

I am saying your traits, etc, you may not realize them all, for example, but they objectively exist. You may not realize your scale and measurement but it exists. That is to say, you don't know the degree of your intelligence for example but it exists. The same is true of your goodness, praise, or evil or inner beauty or inner ugliness.

I am saying it's the case we either objectively exist or we don't objectively exist.

Phrasing.