Breaking down the "God sees argument"

[chimp3]

Assume we don't have objective existence. We would then be an subjective experience only.  

Then we have two options:

Either our subjective experience of ourselves can have some justification 
Or must be completely baseless.


Assume we have objective existence.

Then we have following options.

Either our subjective experience can be justified in some degree.
It still cannot be justified at all and must be completely baseless.

Saying you don't have objective existence is the equivalent to saying you don't have existence. Subjective existence is then not possible.