Breaking down the "God sees argument"

[Edwardo Piet]

Well to be fair, the only place we can experience anything is inside ourself whether it comes from the inside our the outside.

Correct. Reality is at least phenomenological. At the very least the phenomenal world exists and the noumenal is rather irrelevant for it is untouchable by definition.

I cannot subjectively experience what is happening in New York because I am not objectively there...

Correct.

but I'm sure it's going on quite objectively finely without me and there

At least to those who do experience it if not yourself.

are as many subjective experiences of New York as there are people in it.

That is true. And it may be the case New York only exists as phenomenological experiences and it has no objective existence independent of its phenomenological reality which is still objectively existent ontologically & the noumenal absolute objective non-subjective reality of New York independent of our phenomenological experientiality of it as persons is nonexistent... however I doubt it. I intuit with great certainty that the noumenal New York exists... however it's rather irrelevant to the practical world we live in. All we need to posit is the phenomenal world and the philosophically phenomenal New York... the noumenal world and New York is unnecessary.