Has 'anecdotal evidence' now become a euphemism for 'revelation'? The change in terms doesn't make the burning bush story any more believable. Keep in mind that this is the same dude that disappeared and came back with some special rules. Anybody else see a pattern?
Jormungger (sp?) had it right earlier. Believability comes down to the claim and the source among other variables.
I conclude that the entire purpose of this thread is an attempt to lead us heathens toward the reasonable light of the power of anectotal evidence only to find that it's a revelation freight train bearing down on our asses.
RoadRunner,
Nobody is taking the bait; time to cut the line.
Jormungger (sp?) had it right earlier. Believability comes down to the claim and the source among other variables.
I conclude that the entire purpose of this thread is an attempt to lead us heathens toward the reasonable light of the power of anectotal evidence only to find that it's a revelation freight train bearing down on our asses.
RoadRunner,
Nobody is taking the bait; time to cut the line.
