Anecdotal Evidence

[Pat Mustard]

All those circumstances start with the exclamation "Shit, we've got nothing". That should tell you something about the veracity of the stuff you hold dear.

You're projecting.

Ad hom. I am not. But it is a fact that when religions think they have science on their side the proclaim it loudly from the tree tops, like with all them fundagelical christians and muslims who go around saying "the bible/qu'ran predicted this scientific formula with this incredibly vague and meaningless passage of text".

Reasonable people can review the evidence regarding the Gettysburg address and come to a conclusion regarding it.

A) What the flying fuck does the Gettysburg address (note I corrected your capitalisation) have to do with science.
B) You are trying to make out that anecdote is as good as evidence yet you don't talk about anecdote.

It seems to scare you that people can do so without a scientist telling them what to think about it.

Now it is you who is putting thoughts into people's heads which don't exist. I am not scared by idiots fooled by Dunning Krueger. I am worried sometimes about the consequences of people who should know better, like politicians pandering to climate change deniers and creatards, enabling the idiots.