RE: Voted yesterday.....
November 2, 2016 at 3:18 pm
(This post was last modified: November 2, 2016 at 3:20 pm by A Theist.)
(November 2, 2016 at 12:00 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(November 2, 2016 at 5:14 am)A Theist Wrote: If she's elected Hillary would be the first president elect to be under a criminal investigation. She's the most corrupt candidate to ever run for the office...
New batch of Wikileaks into Podesta's emails...
'Dump all those emails': Latest WikiLeaks tranche reveals #Podesta advice"
https://www.rt.com/usa/364959-clinton-po...wikileaks/
"Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:57 PM, John Podesta <[email protected]> wrote: > On another matter....and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have > to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later"
https://www.wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/emailid/41841
... and if he's elected, he'll be the first President-elect who might have to put off the inauguration because of a m ongoing criminal trial. And then there's this:
Quote:STEPHANIE RUHLE, MSNBC: David, something that doesn't work for Hillary Clinton is e-mail. And again, we know that Wikileaks, the content hasn't been verified. We are concerned about who the hackers are. But I want to ask you about the the John Podesta e-mail back in 2015 that came out of Wikileaks which says, quote, 'we're going to have to dump all those e-mails.' I mean, that's a tough one.
DAVID BROCK: As you know in Washington parlance, dump means release or make public. So, you know, again you say that these e-mails haven't been authenticated, and that is true.
RUHLE: So hold on, John Podesta wasn't saying --
BROCK: Let's just take it at its face.
No, what he was saying is we're going to have to release or make these e-mails public. Now he knew that 55,000 pages of Secretary Clinton's e-mail had already been turned over. What he was doing was saying we're going to make them public. And the fact is that Secretary Clinton asked the State Department a few days after the date of that e-mail to make these public. They were made public which people forget was really an unprecedented act of transparency to make all those business-related e-mails public. So that's what he was talking about. He references Lanny Davis in there, or Lanny, that's clearly Lanny Davis who is out on television saying the same thing. Let's put all of these e-mails out. So that's what that dump meant.
You can watch the video here. The above exchange starts at about 2:45.
I know that Clinton's a poor, poor choice, but a Trump presidency would be an absolute disaster for America.
What cracks me up is how you "family values" guys are able to close your eyes and hold your noses about this guy, who brags about committing sexual assault ... all because he's got an "R" after his name on the ballot.
Oh please. David Brock is a political hack and a Clinton apologist. I don't buy his BS for one minute. Release, means to release. To make public. Dump, means to get rid of. To hide from the public view and to hide from investigation. I think it was clearly understood what Podesta meant, trash the emails. 33,000 of them still missing from when Hillary was SOS.
Yes, Hillary is a poor poor choice, and without a doubt her presidency would be be the nail in the coffin for this country.
And what cracks me up is how you yellow dogs are so easily duped and you will vote for the most crooked and corrupt politicians as long as there's a D after their names.
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"
Quote: JohnDG...
Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.