RE: Voted yesterday.....
November 2, 2016 at 4:43 pm
(This post was last modified: November 2, 2016 at 4:46 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(November 2, 2016 at 3:18 pm)A Theist Wrote: Oh please. David Brock is a political hack and a Clinton apologist. I don't buy his BS for one minute. Release, means to release. To make public. Dump, means to get rid of. To hide from the public view and to hide from investigation.
Not necessarily. You realize that people use terms in ways that are colloquial to them on occasion, right? For instance, when I say a guy got "dusted off", it doesn't mean that I grabbed a feather duster and went to town (by the way, in this context "went to town" doesn't mean "drove into Austin", it means got to work with alacrity.)
Point being, you're imposing your own views on that phrase when a "dump" can also be in the context of an infodump -- throwing it all out there. For that reason, I find Brock's explanation plausible, and unlike you, I'm willing to await the investigations results and then read and decide for myself.
(November 2, 2016 at 3:18 pm)A Theist Wrote: And what cracks me up is how you yellow dogs are so easily duped and you will vote for the most crooked and corrupt politicians as long as there's a D after their names.
Firstly, I probably won't be voting for Hillary anyway, because of my deep discomfort with her. I will only vote for her if Trump is defeatable here in Texas on the 8th. And -- if you think Trump isn't corrupt, you haven't been paying attention.
Secondly, "yellow dogs"? Really? Been reading Mao's Little Red Book or something lately? Juvenile rhetoric aimed at me, when I've been courteous to you ... what does that say about you, and is that really a message you wish to convey?
Thirdly, I don't vote party-line at all. I'm registered as a Libertarian, but I have voted for both Dems and Republicans as well.
Methinks this shot of yours suffers extremely poor aim. You should probably zero-in your sights next time before going off half-cocked like this again.