RE: Voted yesterday.....
November 2, 2016 at 10:37 pm
(This post was last modified: November 2, 2016 at 10:43 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(November 2, 2016 at 6:37 pm)ReptilianPeon Wrote: I think her track-record and the blatant attacks on democracy are far more serious than where she stored certain e-mails. Evidently, she loves money and war. And a spy from a hostile nation could easily donate some money, maybe a couple million US$, to the Clinton Foundation and gain access to parts of the goverment that are strictly off limits to ordinary people - like that Chicago commodities trader who was put on an advisory board for tactical nuclear weapons.
The ISAB is not part of the government. Also, from your own link --
Quote:"The ISAB's charter stipulates that the board should reflect a balance of backgrounds and points of view. Generally speaking, it's not unusual for the State Department chief of staff to be involved in personnel matters," State Department spokesman Mark Toner said in a statement to CNN.
Here's what wikipedia has to say about him:
Wiki Wrote:Around the same time, an ABC News report brought his appointment into question. In relation to the 2016 presidential election, ABC News revisited the terms of Fernando's ISAB appointment, questioning his experience and contributions to the Clinton Foundation. Those criticisms were later scrutinized as mischaracterizing Fernando's background in cyber security following reports and comment released by the State Department and ISAB. According to the ISAB Charter, membership should reflect a balance of backgrounds, points of view, and demographic diversity and include a wide variety of scientific, military, diplomatic, and political backgrounds.
ISAB executive director Richard Hartman referred Fernando as an expert in "cyber security," and said that Fernando has experience in the private sector implementing sophisticated risk management systems, information technology and international financial markets. Retired Brigadier General Stephen A. Cheney, ISAB member and CEO of American Security Project, recognized Fernando's "expertise in cyber-security [as] a great asset to [U.S.] national security."
Fernando’s expertise in financial systems aligns with ISAB work related to financial security, including a 2014 ISAB report that was released regarding cyber security in the financial industry.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raj_Fernando
Now, do you have evidence she emplaced a "spy", or are you simply regurgitating talking points?
Sounds to me like the latter is the case, given the paltry support in your post. She appointed someone who agreed with her, and who was apparently well-qualified in security issues, to a non-governmental board (no matter your mischaracterization).
Odd fact: as a business manager, I tended to appoint people into positions when they actually agreed with me. That they had a competence I could use was gravy. It doesn't necessarily speak to ethics. I think you're reading into this a little beyond what the source you link says. Got anything else?