(November 2, 2016 at 8:35 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote: It's no surprise to me that we have a Christian here that doesn't know what constitutes evidence.
Claims are not evidence for said claims. Anecdotes themselves are not evidence.
Without induction there is no evidence. Period.
Like beauty, what constitutes evidence is in the eye of the beholder. I'm not dictating what people should accept as evidence, as you seem to be doing. I'm discussing what people actually do consider as evidence in practical application.
Are accounts that Trump fondled women without their consent evidence absent corroborating physical evidence? Some people think yes, with high weight. Some think yes, but with low weight. Some say no. Personally I'm in the middle group, but I'm not going to tell the others that they just don't know what evidence is.
