Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 1, 2025, 7:59 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A quick word on "Overwhelmingly Negative Influences"
RE: A quick word on "Overwhelmingly Negative Influences"
In my opinion, the ONI rule should be about what it says: a negative influence on the forum. Not just on discussion, we already have rules for disrupting discussion. Someone can affect the whole atmosphere of the forum, make many members uncomfortable, and clearly have no particular reason to be here other than to ruin the experience for everyone else; all while carefully skirting the rules. So I would see it as a plug for all the holes in the rules, now and in the future.

Of course it's subjective, but that's why every single staff member has to sign off. If not one person on staff thinks a member has anything to offer and is an overwhelming negative influence, then for the benefit of all the other members, I think it's quite reasonable to cull them. This is way more than a discussion forum, it's a community. It would be selling it short to say otherwise at this point.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: A quick word on "Overwhelmingly Negative Influences" - by robvalue - November 4, 2016 at 1:12 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A Quick Update Tiberius 4 2241 January 22, 2019 at 3:35 pm
Last Post: Mr.Obvious



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)