RE: RE: The positive case for voting Donald Trump for president.
November 5, 2016 at 6:17 am
(This post was last modified: November 5, 2016 at 6:17 am by SteelCurtain.)
(November 5, 2016 at 6:01 am)A Theist Wrote:(November 5, 2016 at 5:42 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: Understanding the definition of "positive case" should be a prerequisite for voting, maybe.
Understanding the definition of "consequences" if Hillary's elected should also be a prerequisite for voting.
A subjective opinion is one thing, but the objective fact of what the words "positive case" mean is entirely another, and not up for debate.
I understand what the consequences of a Clinton presidency are. I am sure Breitbart has told you she's coming after your guns and will rip the baby right out of any woman's womb just before it's born, but those of us rooted in reality know otherwise.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
