Anecdotal Evidence

[John V]

I don't think that's true, actually.  I think most people who believe in the Christian God believe for one of three reasons:
1)  They are raised in Christian families, and kids believe what they are told is true, with little or no ability to discern truth.
2)  Some people are shocked (for example by the death of a loved one), such that their world view is damaged, putting them in an "open" state in which they aren't sure what's true, and therefore rely on the truth judgments of others.
3)  Some people consciously choose to suspend disbelief in a kind of spiritual suicide-- "I hate myself and my life, and I want to be part of something that is good."  Examples would be prison convicts.

Those all involve personal testimony and/or the Bible.

My point is that I don't think there's really anyone who is persuaded by the particular quality of evidence of either the Bible or its believers.  I think the individual arrives at a state in which they suspend their disbelief.  Now, be careful to note that I'm not saying the Bible is necessarily wrong, or that the religion is necessarily wrong-- I'm just saying that it is not through the acceptance of the weight of evidence by which ANY Christian becomes so.

My primary evidence for this is simple-- that in other geographic regions, children, grieving widows, or reformed criminals end up believing in Islam, or Hinduism or whatever.  So it's not the religion itself which reaches out to sensible listeners, but rather eager listeners who absorb the religion that first appeals to them.

And those people accepted testimony, personal and/or historical, on Islam, Hinduism, or whatever.

I think I get, and agree with, your point that there is an emotional component to most people's belief. Few just conducted a cold, clinical analysis and came to believe. Still, they ended up where they got based in part on testimony, so saying that it can't be used as evidence is clearly wrong.