(November 9, 2016 at 9:49 am)Whateverist Wrote: I liked this bit in the NY times:
Ben Wallace\s piece in the NY Times titled "Who Believed in Trump, and Who is to Blame? Wrote:This does not seem to be only a political event. Trump never should have gotten close. That so many Americans who are struggling with money picked Trump must mean that our version of capitalism could use some further adjustments. That so many Americans in places where the economy is on the rise also chose Trump raises the possibility that our leaders promise too much, that we expect that more is possible than really is. That such a proudly amoral and publicly hateful man could become the choice of large majorities of observant Christians suggests some weakness in our religious life and our expressions of morality. That he did not lose more support after his racism and misogyny became well-known suggests how commonplace these resentments must be, between husbands and wives and between neighbors. There was not enough individual decency to make plain Trump’s indecency. We are not so good a people as we thought.
http://www.newyorker.com/news/benjamin-w...s-to-blame
So who do you blame? The DNC? Hillary?
My first inclination is to blame the education system. How could people not see the false promise of a strong man saying "only I can do it, trust me and don't worry about the details?" Even more than that, there are a lot of people not doing well economically and rolling the dice on change probably beats betting on slow, incremental improvement to them.
Or maybe human nature is simply tragic? Why do we look for a savior anyway? The trouble with looking for someone better than yourself to rescue you is it still depends on you to recognize the right one.
Honestly I think he won because he had the most air time and people voted for the man off the telly.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.