Anecdotal Evidence

[RoadRunner79]

Here's the thing, RR.

You are trying to generalize into a principle a kind of evidence which, at best, has value in specific circumstances.  I can't speak for anyone else, but since I know you are Christian, I suspect it's a slippery slope argument-- "Well if SOME anecdotal evidence has value, then anecdotes should be one of the kinds of evidence that we consider (in the case of religion)."

Ok... can you define the specific circumstances, and justify the reasoning behind the difference?

As Rhythm pointed out, anecdotal evidence could also be considered with regard to UFO claims.  I'd add that they could be considered with regard to Greek and Roman gods, to magic, to the effectiveness of crystals and Ouija boards, and so on.  Unless you are willing to take EVERYONE'S word on EVERYTHING, then you are left special pleading-- MY favorite idea should be allowed to look to anecdote (call it testimonial if you want) for support-- but of course those other crazy guys are just being silly.

I agree, that in those cases, that it would need to be considered.   However as I have said before, I am not saying that we just believe everything without question.   But on the other hand, don't act like the voice of reason and critical thinking, if you are dismissing the evidence without question either.