Agnostic Skepticism- My Views

[robvalue]

It's fine. You don't have to use any definitions. It's just a matter of being clear what you mean. Discussion is pointless if terms aren't agreed.

I'm happy to use whatever definitions you want for any given discussion. But what isn't acceptable to me is to then try and use my definitions to make a point after we've agreed to use yours; or vice versa. That's called an equivocation fallacy.

No one expects you to call yourself an atheist while you are here. But if you insist you are "different" to us, we're going to take issue, when you describe exactly the same position. I call that "elite agnosticism". We've had a few here like that.

Of course, some of us are strong atheists. But it depends what the claim is. You're probably a strong atheist regarding certain claims.

(Not that I'm any kind of authority here. I'm just giving my opinion.)