(November 16, 2016 at 3:13 pm)Rhythm Wrote:(November 16, 2016 at 3:02 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: So are you saying; that I shouldn't believe what scientists tell me, unless I can see it for my self?Ding ding ding ding ding. In case you didn't know this, science is -built- on this very statement. That's what demonstration, replication, and peer review are all about. Science does not ask for or require -anyone's- belief. If you think that science is "just what some scientists told me" then you're out there on the deep end. Realizing this won;t pull you back from the "testimony" song and dance, ofc, you'll just find another way to keep bullshitting us and yourself...because you just can't handle the fact that your silly little beliefs are not the same thing, that they're not even on the same level.
To my understanding, peer review doesn't involve seeing the experiment for ones self. And if you follow the journal Nature, you may find that there is a growing awareness of a repeatability problem within science.
Now I think that you have a misunderstanding of the roles of these things in science, we could discuss it, but I'll just wait for you to provide evidence for you claims.
