RE: Dialetheism
November 17, 2016 at 6:42 pm
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2016 at 6:43 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
You're equivocating again.
You're confusing the conceptualization of absolute laws with the absolute laws themselves again.
You're making use/mention errors again.
Something is true when it corresponds to reality.
You're literally asking me to rationally justify rationality. That makes no sense. A=A is the premise.
I've already dealt with this. You've got things backwards. You must exist and be yourself first before you can rationally justify it. Asking me how I know that something is what it is makes no sense. Reality first, then knowledge.
You're confusing the conceptualization of absolute laws with the absolute laws themselves again.
You're making use/mention errors again.
Something is true when it corresponds to reality.
You're literally asking me to rationally justify rationality. That makes no sense. A=A is the premise.
I've already dealt with this. You've got things backwards. You must exist and be yourself first before you can rationally justify it. Asking me how I know that something is what it is makes no sense. Reality first, then knowledge.
