RE: Trump won the white working-man vote..
November 18, 2016 at 2:36 pm
(This post was last modified: November 18, 2016 at 2:39 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(November 18, 2016 at 2:19 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(November 18, 2016 at 11:49 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: Because it doesn't increase the odds that they will vote for your candidate next time, I'd imagine. No one is talking about the people who would never vote for a Democrat. We're talking about the ones who didn't vote for the Democrat this time.
Yeah, I'm speaking in the context of this discussion, not from the perspective of the candidate who'll be running. That's exactly why I wrote that Hillary using the term "basket of deplorables" was a big blunder.
I think it's important to make those Trump voters understand that we don't think all of them are irredeemable bigots. But it is equally important to get them to understand that a vote cannot be spent a la carte, and you select from a menu of your candidate's positions. Like it or not, when you vote (for whatever reason) for a bigot, his bigotry has gotten your support. When you buy the boat, you have to take the leaks, too.
But if you say this, you have to say it about Hillary''s voters too:
"Like it or not, when you vote (for whatever reason) for a liar/criminal/corrupt politician, those traits have your support."
I think it honestly doesn't do any good to sit here and chastise people for voting for who they did. The 2 "real" candidates for president both sucked. Many people simply voted for who they thought was less awful. But it's over now. Whatever side wants to win next time, has to play their cards right.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh