1)"Not everything" is "some thing" that is not "everything".
2) It's not about the box, it's about the state of the cat.
It seems that you're saying it can't be applied to all of science. In my book that does not seem like an absolute.
3) Again, not all are about language.
4) Answer the question, are they a tool of philosophy? What you said strikes me as circular. The problem would then be the acceptance of "absolute". Can "absolute" not be questioned from the beginning? OK, I don't accept "absolute". See #2. I'm not redefining, I'm not accepting your definition.
2) It's not about the box, it's about the state of the cat.
It seems that you're saying it can't be applied to all of science. In my book that does not seem like an absolute.
3) Again, not all are about language.
4) Answer the question, are they a tool of philosophy? What you said strikes me as circular. The problem would then be the acceptance of "absolute". Can "absolute" not be questioned from the beginning? OK, I don't accept "absolute". See #2. I'm not redefining, I'm not accepting your definition.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
