RE: On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument
November 21, 2016 at 10:03 am
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2016 at 10:05 am by The Grand Nudger.)
Why anyone would expect a zealot to treat an argument any differently than they treat the beliefs around which the argument gravitates is beyond me, lol. The arguments -can't be flawed- for all the same reasons that their god -has to be real-. Our boy Theo didn;t argue himself into accepting god or the five ways, don't expect to argue him out of either. That's just not how it works.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
