RE: New religious cult in rise?
November 26, 2016 at 1:14 am
(This post was last modified: November 26, 2016 at 1:55 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
('A')
Athene is quite the intellect.
However, Athenism (of a solely reasonable component; logic) is nonsense, whence said reasonable component is generable separately.
Simply, beliefs (ie Spinozism - upon which athenism compacts) are quintessentially redundant/remiss.
.
.
.
('B') ~ BELIEF BIAS|REMISS:
Belief constructs quintessentially stipulate EMOTIONAL BIAS.
Samples:
[i] It is a FACT that the MOST EDUCATED people are quite likely the LEAST RELIGIOUS.
[ii] Theists predominantly ignore scientific evidence, on the horizon of emotional bias/belief/faith.
[iii] Isaac Newton, on the boundary of belief in God (See Principia) failed to compute a certain problem. {Newton invoked God, particularly stipulating that his failure [of the aforesaid problem] persisted on the regime of the non-solvable; a solely SUPPOSEDLY God-calculable regime.}
NOTE: Said problem had been subsequently reduced via an atheist, Laplace.
[iv]... [v]... ... [M]... [V]...
Religion (a rather profound belief) thereafter, in many a scenario, appears as a bounder on intellect.
.
.
.
('C') ~ BELIEF REDUNDANCY:
The universe's best description, Quantum Mechanics, consists of probabilities.
Therein, there persist:
1) An enumeration of probabilities, upon which optimal actions are computable.
2) An enumeration of beliefs, upon which actions are HAPHAZARDLY computable, (for beliefs exist such that non-factual/non-probabilistic baseis are invocable.) quintessentially on the horizon of said probabilities.
The aforesaid enumeration, of beliefs, is entirely redundant/remiss/time-space complex imprudent; for one may compute solely on probabilities.
Athene is quite the intellect.
However, Athenism (of a solely reasonable component; logic) is nonsense, whence said reasonable component is generable separately.
Simply, beliefs (ie Spinozism - upon which athenism compacts) are quintessentially redundant/remiss.
.
.
.
('B') ~ BELIEF BIAS|REMISS:
Belief constructs quintessentially stipulate EMOTIONAL BIAS.
Samples:
[i] It is a FACT that the MOST EDUCATED people are quite likely the LEAST RELIGIOUS.
[ii] Theists predominantly ignore scientific evidence, on the horizon of emotional bias/belief/faith.
[iii] Isaac Newton, on the boundary of belief in God (See Principia) failed to compute a certain problem. {Newton invoked God, particularly stipulating that his failure [of the aforesaid problem] persisted on the regime of the non-solvable; a solely SUPPOSEDLY God-calculable regime.}
NOTE: Said problem had been subsequently reduced via an atheist, Laplace.
[iv]... [v]... ... [M]... [V]...
Religion (a rather profound belief) thereafter, in many a scenario, appears as a bounder on intellect.
.
.
.
('C') ~ BELIEF REDUNDANCY:
The universe's best description, Quantum Mechanics, consists of probabilities.
Therein, there persist:
1) An enumeration of probabilities, upon which optimal actions are computable.
2) An enumeration of beliefs, upon which actions are HAPHAZARDLY computable, (for beliefs exist such that non-factual/non-probabilistic baseis are invocable.) quintessentially on the horizon of said probabilities.
The aforesaid enumeration, of beliefs, is entirely redundant/remiss/time-space complex imprudent; for one may compute solely on probabilities.
