(June 20, 2011 at 6:59 am)The Magic Pudding Wrote:(June 20, 2011 at 6:28 am)Stue Denim Wrote:(June 20, 2011 at 6:04 am)The Magic Pudding Wrote:(June 20, 2011 at 5:18 am)Stue Denim Wrote: Ah, but you are you, I am me, you are not me. I was talking about me and not you, I have no idea wether or not being you instead of me would be a good thing, though I do know it wouldn't be AS good.
I'm sure because whenever I check, I'm me, not somebody else. Hardly conclusive evidence I know (Being me and all), but I'm yet to have a negative result.
It's impossible for me to check at times when I'm not me, because It wouldn't be me checking.
You haven't convinced me, maybe if you asked other people if they'd seen someone else being you, or you being someone else. And how about all the bacteria and stuff that are you, have they been consulted for their opinion?
Nobody else who I have been in contact with has ever let on that I have ever been somebody else, many people try to be me, all have failed. But now I am worried, what if I were somebody else pretending to be me at times, how would the people who know me know? I am after all the only one who can pull of a convincing impression of being me...
They have all been consulted, they all agreed, except for one, who is no longer a part of me.
You're only fooling yourself you know.
Exactly, it's ME fooling myself, not somebody else. phew!
