(January 26, 2017 at 8:27 am)Tazzycorn Wrote:(January 26, 2017 at 6:58 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Is that as low as name calling, and resorting to the genetic fallacy? Also they do cite back to Reuters if you would prefer.
And again, I'm still waiting for a little more direct and detailed testimony, for evidence; rather than what appears to be vague gossip. Here we do have a reputable news source, referring to an official statement by one of the agencies.
While I do fear, that too many on both sides are heading in this direction; I also have hope that we haven't gotten to that point yet. Or at least, that it doesn't escalate further.
But I think that ideas should be judged based on their content and reasons, not based on the source or its conclusion.
I've read many posts on uncommon descent, including the one you linked, and not one single one of them told the truth. It is common knowledge that that blog is written by a lying crank who shuts down debate and censors anyone who dares to correct him.
As I said citing the blog is a new lo for you.
I would encourage you to search a little. You can find similar stories on Scientific American or a number of other places if you prefer. Your claim would appear to be false.
