(January 28, 2017 at 4:37 pm)Jesster Wrote:(January 28, 2017 at 4:04 pm)ComradeMeow Wrote: Yet I never once defined atheism. So how on earth can you say I do not understand what atheism is?
I would think that a fellow atheist would have more sense than this but you are obviously lacking. Oh well, go troll somebody else.
You did, however, state that I was a heretic and a blasphemer for not buying into your love of philosophy. You are clearly showing how you think philosophy is a requirement of atheism, which it is not. It's wonderful if you take it to that level, but that's going far beyond what atheism calls for. Good luck with your philosophical ramblings, but it's not necessary.
Oh, and if you think this is me trolling, I think it's clear to see that you are the idiot here. Is this your first trip to the internet?
No, I said that with a smilie, I was being sarcastic! That is what I was referring to earlier, when I said
Quote:Also how on earth can you not even read the sarcasm at the end?!
Obviously you should know that atheism is not a religion and henceforth there is no such thing as heresy. I never said philosophy is necessary for atheism, I never said this in any shape or form. I merely said philosophy is what creates many atheists and a quick look at history shows this. Skeptics like Plato, Pythagoras, al-Ma'arri, Muhammad al-Razi, and Nietzsche are all products of philosophy. That is all that I am saying, I never insinuated anything else other than a historical analysis.
I am going to ignore your insults because obviously you read something into what I said that was never there. Can we not call this a truce and learn to get along please? I do not wish to start a fight with somebody because they misread a joke.
Ut supra, ita inferius
Uƚ ƨuqɿɒ, iƚɒ inʇɘɿiuƨ