(January 30, 2017 at 11:55 pm)Aegon Wrote:Good question. I honestly don't know if she overstepped her bounds, but she said she questioned the "moral and ethical" bounds of it, not just the legal.(January 30, 2017 at 11:20 pm)Aroura Wrote: Really, is he just going to govern by silencing his critics?
And still his supporters cannot see the problem....sigh.
She questioned it's legality, which is her job. At least imho.
She refused to defend the government in all the suits against the POTUS. Is it not the AG's/Justice Department's job to defend the federal government in these lawsuits? (Genuine question)
Should we have officials that do what the POTUS wants, even if it is illegal or unethical?
Maybe TRJF can pop in and explain this to us in better detail, though he's not a constitutional lawyer, he probably knows more about it that we do.
“Eternity is a terrible thought. I mean, where's it going to end?”
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
