RE: What if the government was run by scientists?
February 21, 2017 at 7:53 pm
(This post was last modified: February 21, 2017 at 7:54 pm by bennyboy.)
(February 20, 2017 at 11:38 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(February 20, 2017 at 7:22 pm)bennyboy Wrote: I think there should be a House of Science, with a PhD required for any chance for appointment/election. All factual decisions, like whether there's global warming, like the best way to teach, and so on, should have to be overseen by people who know how to make observations and decisions.
The idea that science has no place in government is fucktarded.
. . . says the person who expects her man to put his Anthony where pee and blood come out of her body, as well as mucus and a bunch of other bioliquid hazards. Let's face it, the most hygienic option is option "C"-- porn and a bottle of handcream. But Willy wants what Willy wants-- watcha gonna do?
Call me crazy, but I think poop is way grosser and dirtier than blood and vaginal mucus lol.
1) You're crazy. Shakespeare had it right: below the belt, women are all fire and brimstone.
2) If hygiene is the goal, then a sex doll, a vibrating device of some kind, or even a clean towelette are all way more hygienic than any kind of actual sex. Turns out that people like sex because it fires pleasure neurons, gives them a sense of connection, makes the heart beat a little faster, and so on. A bit of yesterday's lunch on the wiener isn't going to make a guy give up all that, if anal is what triggers him best.
3) My wife won't do anal, and I really have little interest in it. But she'll blow me after I've been screwing her for 20 minutes, and she'll happily pretend not to notice the tip of my finger up her ass when it's time to finish her. And she's one of the nicest, cleanest girls I've known in my life. So. . . yeah, people aren't really that concerned with cleanliness tbh.
