RE: Working backwards.
February 24, 2017 at 2:26 pm
(This post was last modified: February 24, 2017 at 2:27 pm by Mystic.)
(February 24, 2017 at 2:21 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:(February 24, 2017 at 2:13 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Most Atheists say they don't believe God doesn't exist but don't know if he exists. Why take a side of the fence before investigating?
To say there are no proofs of God is a tall claim. Never seen an Atheist justify that but just say it would be presented to humanity and there would be no Atheists if there were some. But I think that is a weak argument.
At the very least, if you wish to say there is no evidence to God, you should consider the approach that I talked about.
There certainly is no proof for god.
What is for certain is there no proof for that claim of yours. At least, none presented by anyone here.
Quote: In fact what a god is supposed to be has never really been explained to me.
What is it made of?
What does it look like?
How does it do these magical things its supposed to do?
I want well supported and peer reviewed scientific articles to back up anything you might put.
So you will want Scientists to prove and explain all these things to you, but won't give the Creator a chance to speak by closing your ears to what potentially is from him?
Please see the OP, and see the argument I made for the case, of why I think Atheists should consider this approach.
