(February 24, 2017 at 2:29 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:It's not presupposition, it gives the possibility of the Creator existing, and the possibility that he would prove himself and the correct explanation to life. It doesn't assume he exists.(February 24, 2017 at 2:26 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: So you will want Scientists to prove and explain all these things to you, but won't give the Creator a chance to speak by closing your ears to what potentially is from him?
Please see the OP, and see the argument I made for the case, of why I think Atheists should consider this approach.
Or approach is one of presupposition and is not a valid way to get to truth.
It is the opposite and will only lead to you seeing what you want to see.
You fit reality to the facts you want rather than the facts to reality.
Its why there are still creationists and other poor deluded fools.
It just an approach instead of mocking this issue and belittling it, to take it seriously, to the extent, you give the possibility of the Creator proving himself and who he is.