(March 11, 2017 at 5:57 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: Presumably you have seriously examined the evidence and found it wanting. That's okay. You're entitled to your opinion. Still, that means you have reasons not to believe. Those beliefs about why the evidence should not be accepted are every bit as subject to scrutiny as claims that they should. It's one thing to say "Don't know, don't care" in response to apologetics. It's another thing say, "I don't believe because...." since that now creates a burden of proof to show that your objection is valid.
What happens if what you call evidence for your God is not viewed as evidence by someone else? In your opinion, do you think that theists, deists, atheists, agnostics, and etc, are using the term 'evidence' in the same way?
Out of curiosity, in your opinion, what would be valid and acceptable reasons for disbelief? Furthermore, is it possible that reality is far more complex than seeing it in terms of belief and disbelief?
P.S. Could you please elaborate on what you consider to be evidence for your God?
