I have no personal problem with killing animals for food, we have to eat right? I just object to the way it can be done.
That's just my subjective opinion.
What isn't negotiable in this is what the law has to say on the issue. Whether you agree with laws or not they are there for a purpose. Now why do we have animal rights legislation, but then actively dismiss it in the name of a religion? Why can slitting an animals' throat be ok if it is done in the name of Islam, but not in the name of the invisible pink unicorn? Rules for some and not for others.
That's just my subjective opinion.
What isn't negotiable in this is what the law has to say on the issue. Whether you agree with laws or not they are there for a purpose. Now why do we have animal rights legislation, but then actively dismiss it in the name of a religion? Why can slitting an animals' throat be ok if it is done in the name of Islam, but not in the name of the invisible pink unicorn? Rules for some and not for others.