(March 15, 2017 at 5:27 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Not sure what you mean.
Anyway, Just as Jesus's birth didn't require any sperm it also didn't require an egg, he was created in the womb of Mary (essentially making her a surrogate) and had no biological connection to Mary, hence why he never referred to her as 'mother' but called her 'woman'.
If he was in her womb and she needed to give birth to him, even without "biological components", she is still the mother, surrogate, or not.
Which brings up the question, once again: Why was Mary used in the first place? Surely god could have created his own Earthly avatar, fully formed, without going through the process of knocking up a man's wife?
Yes, and calling her "woman" and not "mother" or even "Mary", is an indicator of being a spiteful little shit.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"
