(March 18, 2017 at 1:25 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Aslem's
Anselm, MysticKnight. Anselm. Not "Aslem".
(March 18, 2017 at 1:25 am)MysticKnight Wrote: argument is sound
No. Anselm's argument is at best valid. It is not and cannot be sound, because it is explicitly not making use of any evidence to prove that its premises are actually true. That is why it is called an ontological argument.
(March 18, 2017 at 1:25 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Perfections as a concept exist and are also part of reality. We also acknowledge existence to be a perfection.
No and no.
Serious questions: are you on drugs, and is English your first language?
"Owl," said Rabbit shortly, "you and I have brains. The others have fluff. If there is any thinking to be done in this Forest - and when I say thinking I mean thinking - you and I must do it."
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner