Why would I be?
That I don't think limbless people are the ideal choice for a track team barring some sort of artificial assistance doesn't mean I'm prejudiced against limbless people. In the normal use of the word, to be prejudiced against a category of person implies that the opinion does not, in fact, follow from the category. 'White men can't be good at basketball' is prejudiced. 'Limbless people can't be good at basketball without significant assistance or concessions' is not. It is factual that few basketball teams would be improved in terms of winning more competitions with a higher percentage of quadriplegics on the floor. Unless they were in super-athletic, mobility-granting exo-suits. That would be awesome.
That I don't think limbless people are the ideal choice for a track team barring some sort of artificial assistance doesn't mean I'm prejudiced against limbless people. In the normal use of the word, to be prejudiced against a category of person implies that the opinion does not, in fact, follow from the category. 'White men can't be good at basketball' is prejudiced. 'Limbless people can't be good at basketball without significant assistance or concessions' is not. It is factual that few basketball teams would be improved in terms of winning more competitions with a higher percentage of quadriplegics on the floor. Unless they were in super-athletic, mobility-granting exo-suits. That would be awesome.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
