RE: To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!
March 24, 2017 at 10:28 am
(This post was last modified: March 24, 2017 at 10:32 am by Mystic.)
(March 24, 2017 at 10:23 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: Love and value are not invalidated by subjectivity. You're essentially arguing that these phenomenon need to be transcendent to be real, and that they can only be transcendent if there is an eternal standard in God. This is an argument from ignorance; you can't see how these phenomenon can be transcendent without God, therefore God. Well that's a fallacious argument. And it's easily dismissed on that basis.
My argument is that what we love cannot be just the mask that others put or what we or others tell ourselves we are. It has to be something real. And that who we are and judgment are interlinked. Love depends on judgment. Take away REAL you, and what is love to love?
The subjective you created by a brain that has no authority on who you truly are, neither to judge, neither to order you!
Are we in love with real "who" of people, even though, we may not know it fully or even have false conceptions of them, or are win love with simply with the subjective judgment that has no objective basis?
Love as I said many times, proves, we know we have exact value. It's our most foundational essence to who we are, and what we know.
Quote:False. Something can exist without being viewed."Who" has to be viewed though.
