(April 7, 2017 at 8:59 am)Harry Nevis Wrote:(April 6, 2017 at 4:06 pm)SteveII Wrote: Bart Ehrman is a NT skeptic with an important-to-note bias--he does not believe in God. Am is supposed to type out a list of scholars who disagree with him? That would be an appeal to authority.
God forbid anybody be skeptical of the supernatural. The fact that he does not believe gives him more credibility than the scholars/apologists that do believe.
The irony of your first sentence is amusing. A bias so central to the topic produces a product that only those who hold that bias find compelling. It's not credible, it's circular.
