FaithNoMore Wrote:You seem to be assuming that anyone who responds to what you've said didn't actually read it, and anyone who disagrees with you is labeled as arrogant. What is your basis for these accusations?
No, it is fine if someone disagrees with me, if they've misunderstood my words that is also fine. I call people arrogant whom I feel read my post and jumped to all kinds of conclusions not indicated by my post for malevolent reasons. These negative assumptions about me always end up in me unnecessarily elaborting on my original posts without adding anything new.
FaithNoMore Wrote:Why is it that you expect civil responses when you call people ignorant?
It should be clear by now that no negativity was intended as I, cleary, am trying to withhold my own negativity. I was only attempting to state what I felt is reasonably true of someone who would assert that God does not exist.
thebigfudge Wrote:This is another case of someone arguing for proof of assertion by argument ad nauseum. His definition of God is so vast it encompassed everything.
Yet look under the many many words he uses, he repeats the same argument over and over. " we dont know therefore God is possible" even though it has been covered many times that God has no basis.
See what I mean? I'm going to repeat myself and say "I have never argued for proof of anything, these are simply my beliefs which have stated in my original post simply because I thought it would be fair for everyone to know where i was coming from and actually has nothing to do with this thread other than that.
Next I'm going to repeat my quote "God is anyone that, at least, has the property that he created the universe"
and then I'm going to, reasonably respond " we don't know therefore God is possible" is true, as any rational person would agree to and also why atheist do not assert that God does not exist.
Which is absolutely nothing new compared to what I've been saying.
moving right along
Napoleon Wrote:I don't understand your 'argument' because it makes no sense. Not because I didn't read it. In fact a lot of your writing is convoluted and nonsensical
Next, I will make the suggestion I've made many times, now " if you don't understand the argument, ask to elaborated before asserting negative claims based on them"
