Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: February 7, 2025, 3:17 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What are the Characteristics of a NT Christian?
RE: What are the Characteristics of a NT Christian?
(April 25, 2017 at 2:07 pm)Grandizer Wrote:
(April 25, 2017 at 9:35 am)SteveII Wrote: 1/2. And how many times do I have to say that it is an atheist argument and all I have to do is undercut the premise that it is actually possible (versus broadly logically possible) that God could create a world were everyone would always choose good.

Ok, Steve, I have let you get away with the red herring distinction between "actually possible" and "broadly logically possible" for far too many posts, so I'm going to ask you to either provide an argument that there is such a distinction (using an illustrative example) or stop making the distinction without warrant. As far as I'm concerned, they're the same thing. Let me elaborate a little with an example:

It is logically possible for a flying teapot to exist per se but, under certain constraints, it is not logically possible for it to exist. This, however, does not mean a flying teapot is not actually possible, rather the flying teapot is actually possible as long as certain constraints are not imposed. So the distinction isn't between "actually possible" and "logically possible" but rather between "possible per se" and "possible under certain constraints".

Also, just to be clear, "actually possible" is not the same as "actual", nor is it the same as "probable" or "plausible".

So if you're going to concede, Steve, that it is logically possible for humans to choose good all the time, then this means the same thing as it being actually possible. And if you want to defeat this argument (I'm happy to call it an argument), then you need to provide an argument that shows that such perfectly consistent and universal human choice for good can never occur in any possible world that God could create.

Quote:I have undercut with it does not seem possible that such a world could exist. This is an intuitive and reasonable conclusion after observing human history. You do not have a defeater for that objection and that is just one reason the PoE argument fails and no one outside of atheist forums think it is a successful logical argument.

Steve, you only get to observe the actual world. There are other possible worlds in which every human chooses good all the time. Don't confuse "actual possibility" with "probability/plausibility".

And it is not true that only people on atheist forums have problems with the PoE. Some atheist philosophers (like J. L. Mackie) still find issue with the logical problem of evil. Funnily enough, I actually don't, believe it or not. My problem is really with your failure to defeat the objection being raised against the impossibility of a world where all humans choose good always. But if there is a PoE I would defend, it would be the evidential problem of evil as opposed to the logical one.

By the way, you might want to check this link for reference:
http://www.iep.utm.edu/evil-log/

Quote:3. No, I believe in dualism. The immaterial mind causes material things to happen. No determinism there. No determinism, no compatiblism.

lol, if no determinism, then the immaterial mind just randomly causes material things to happen? Dualism or monism, it's irrelevant. When you make a choice, the same logical rules apply, whether the choice was made by a material or immaterial mind.

Broadly logically possible: Through logic alone, it is possible. Logic alone does not preclude it from being true. 
Actually possible: Can it actually exist in some possible world.

I am claiming that the premise: "It is logically possible for God to create a world where everyone always chooses good" is broadly logically possible. However, because it is a contingent proposition (on free will), it seems like it is not actually possible. In other words, there is a factor in addition to logic that might make it impossible. 

3. We need to tighten up the definitions/positions for discussion purposes (these taken from the first sentence of each of the articles from Wikipedia):

Physicalism is the ontological thesis that "everything is physical", that there is "nothing over and above" the physical, or that everything supervenes on the physical.
Determinism is the philosophical position that for every event there exist conditions that could cause no other event.
Compatibilism is the thesis that free will is compatible with determinism. 
Dualism or duality is the position that mental phenomena are, in some respects, non-physical, or that the mind and body are not identical. 

I am a non-physicalist, non-deterministic, dualist-interactionist. And as such I believe that the immaterial mind has actual free will to make real choices not always influenced by some prior cause.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: What are the Characteristics of a NT Christian? - by SteveII - April 25, 2017 at 2:53 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How can a Christian reject part of the Bible and still call themselves a Christian? KUSA 371 103251 May 3, 2020 at 1:04 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
  Characteristics of the Christian God SteveII 30 5544 June 29, 2018 at 3:21 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Yet more christian logic: christian sues for not being given a job she refuses to do. Esquilax 21 8115 July 20, 2014 at 2:48 pm
Last Post: ThomM
  Relationships - Christian and non-Christian way Ciel_Rouge 6 6735 August 21, 2012 at 12:57 pm
Last Post: frankiej



Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)