(April 27, 2017 at 1:19 pm)SteveII Wrote:(April 27, 2017 at 11:52 am)Grandizer Wrote: There is no disconnect that I can see here, but this seems to fit well with compatibilism and if it's meant to be describing libertarian free will, it doesn't seem to provide a sufficient description.
The disconnect, if you need one, is in the elaboration you provided in this quote below:
I already explained what's wrong with this description in my previous response.
Then it seems you are asserting that only physical brain states are responsible for decisions. The only support I know for that conclusion is to presuppose naturalism (it can be no other way). If that is your reasoning, it is question begging. Is there another reason to believe that that is all that is happening?
How about zero evidence to suggest otherwise, for starters...
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
