RE: What are the Characteristics of a NT Christian?
April 28, 2017 at 8:39 am
(This post was last modified: April 28, 2017 at 8:47 am by Harry Nevis.)
(April 27, 2017 at 7:35 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(April 27, 2017 at 6:27 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Math you moron! Speed of light, red shift, cosmic microwave background radiation. ...well let me dumb it down for you, the big bang is no fucking different than coming across a car someone just parked walked away, you don't see them but you feel the heat of the hood. CLUES you fucking idiot. No different than coming across a murder scene way after the murder has left. MATH tells us everything about the age of our planet, the age of our sun, the age of our galaxy and the age of our universe. Just like taking a tape measure and working backwards with it.
Out of apologetics, so resorting to stupid memes?
(April 27, 2017 at 9:22 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:(April 27, 2017 at 2:06 pm)Harry Nevis Wrote: It can be, if you only believe...
Like your sig, Lady. I'm going to a Tom Waits tribute concert tonight. Hopefully, someone will cover, "Christmas card From A Hooker in Minneapolis".
Oh, Thank you, Harry! That sounds like a lot of fun; I hope they can do his voice justice!
Fucking FANTASTIC song, btw. [emoji41]. Sometimes I think 70's Tom Waits is my favorite Tom Waits, until I listen to Raindogs, that is. [emoji16]
It was great! Covered Chocolate Jesus, also. I'm more of a fan of his Asylum era, but so much good stuff in all his stuff. Disappointingly, no "hooker". (Boy, if I had a dollar for every time I said THAT...)
(April 27, 2017 at 9:33 pm)SteveII Wrote:Can't blame us for not making a guess on the number of angels dancing on the head of a pin. You're just twisting words to make yourself feel better about the internal consistancy of your fairy tale. You can't actually believe you're chipping away at our ignorance of the existance of your god, do you?(April 27, 2017 at 9:09 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: So then tell us, Steve: How should one navigate through a discussion (with any intellectual honesty, that is) regarding the most accurate definition, and truest description of the nature of such a hypothetical attribute, when the only hypothetical being it has ever been ascribed to can't be demonstrated to exist in the first place?
Maybe afterwords we can have a hearty debate over the exact mechanisms behind Earth's yellow sun making Superman more powerful than a locomotive, eh?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Ah, the favorite fallback position when an atheist can't field a rebuttal: "but...but...you can't prove that what we have been talking about for 518 posts really exists...so...so...I win...so there!
"The last superstition of the human mind is the superstition that religion in itself is a good thing." - Samuel Porter Putnam