as noted by several judges during several gay marriage litigations, opposition side just couldn't come up with anything besides "Godseddso" for a rationale, and as those judges noted, that ain't enough.
One even famously noted the entire case presented to him by the opposition was in fact only a good argument for banning divorce, not furthering a ban on gay marriages. A fundamental inability to advance a cogent argument doomed them, the emperor's new clothes parable springs to mind.
One even famously noted the entire case presented to him by the opposition was in fact only a good argument for banning divorce, not furthering a ban on gay marriages. A fundamental inability to advance a cogent argument doomed them, the emperor's new clothes parable springs to mind.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.